How Thawe Bhavani, a Family's Kuldevi, Subdued a Tamasik Shakti Possessing Their Home — a Case Story
A case story of a family whose home was claimed by a tamasik shakti and how their kuldevi, Thawe Bhavani, brought it under control — with the Rahasu Bhagat lore and the speaker's lesson on serving one's kula shakti.
16 notes, in the order they are taught. Jump to any one.
1 also answer a common question
Questions this answers
1 of the notes below are questions in their own right. Scroll for more.
Grace of one's own kula shakti comes faster than that of outside deities
Kripa-drishti in a moment when the kula shakti is known and served; prarabdha still intervenes
The speaker says it is well known that with all the powers that lie outside one's family it may take time to obtain their grace, but if one has correct knowledge of one's own kula shakti and serves her, her kripa-drishti can reach one within a moment. He adds that even there the prarabdha built by one's own karma does get in the way and has its effect somewhere or other. The case story he tells, he says, is meant to make the listener's faith in the shaktis and principal deity of their own kula firmer.
The speaker says that experience differs from person to person, and that he is presenting the experience of one sadhana after hearing which the listener's faith in the shaktis of their own kula — the family's principal chosen shakti, its principal deity — will become firmer still. It is well known, he says, that with all the powers that lie outside the family it may take us time to obtain their grace. But if we have correct knowledge about our own Kula ShaktiThe collective protective and generative energy of a family lineage, invoked and honored alongside the Kuldevi and Kula Bhairava. and we serve her, her kripa-drishti can reach us within a moment. He adds a qualification: even there, the PrarabdhaThe portion of destiny already set in motion by past actions — spiritual practice and good deeds can lessen its severity, but not eliminate it. built by our own karma does get in the way, and it has its effect somewhere or other.
Case: possession begins on Navratri Shashthi in a house built on bought land
A sattvik, non-sadhak family; swaying at the puja place, memory loss, an angry foreign dialect, "this is my place"
The speaker recounts a true event, about a year and a half old, shared by a Delhi sadhak friend: a man from Saran district, Bihar, working in the industrial belt on the Rajasthan–Delhi road, bought a plot with an old house, built a home and moved in with his parents and newly married wife. The family was sattvik but not spiritual — morning-evening dhoop-deep, at most Hanuman Chalisa. Seven or eight months later, on the Shashthi night of Sharadiya Navratri, the wife walked to the puja place and swayed for half an hour as when a sawari comes, then lay unconscious all night and remembered nothing but a heavy body. The next evening she stood at the gate shouting in an angry Haryana-side Jat dialect that she would not leave, "this is my place".
During Navratri the knowers are in sadhana and do not see cases
Why help is hard to find in the nine nights
The speaker makes a practical point from the case: in the days of Navratri all the knowledgeable people are themselves in sadhana and, as a rule, do not see or hear anyone's case. Wherever the afflicted family asked, everyone was busy, and the possession episodes went on every evening until Navami, when a temple mahant finally called them in.
Case: a bhasma kavach gives only temporary relief; the shakti breaks it on Sharad Purnima
The possessed woman's unnatural strength, and a local knower who speaks her dialect making her sit
The speaker says that on Navami a temple mahant did whatever kriya he knew; the woman's body felt light but the shakti said nothing and gave nothing away. The mahant tied the bhasma of his Navratri Bhagavati hawan on her hand and sent them home, saying he would come to the house if it recurred. It held two or three days; then on Sharad Purnima night she tore off the whole kavach, screamed, and though thin and slight flung anyone who came near four or five feet away. When the mahant arrived with a friend from her dialect's region, she flared up further; that friend said something to her, she sat down quietly, and only then could they ask who she was and what she wanted.
The speaker recounts that when the mahant did whatever kriya he knew, the woman's body became entirely light, but she said nothing — the shakti, the sawari that had come, gave nothing away. The mahant tied the BhasmaSacred ash, used as a substitute for milk in a Shivling's abhishekam when milk isn't available. of the Bhagavati hawan he had done in Navratri onto her hand and sent them back, saying that if it recurred he would come to the house, since nothing could be learned there. For two or three days nothing happened and everyone assumed it had been cured by the visit. Then on the night of Sharad Purnima she broke the entire Kavach that had been put on her, threw it away, and screamed. The speaker notes the strength: though she was thin and slight to look at, whoever went near her was grabbed and flung a good four or five feet away with a jerk. The mahant was informed at once and arrived after an hour or hour and a half with a knowledgeable friend; on seeing them she flared up further and screamed. That friend was from the same region and understood what she was saying; he said something, she sat down quietly, and only then could they begin to ask who she was, what she wanted and what the trouble was.
Case: the sthan shakti's claim to the plot and demand for bali
Long worshipped under a small mango tree the new owners cut; demanding bali marks a tamasik shakti; sellers disclaim everything
The speaker reports the shakti saying through the woman that she had been worshipped at that place for a very long time; her sthan was under a small mango tree that never grew big, the old family did her puja there, and the new owners had cut the tree. "I want my puja. I take bali, I need bali." She would not leave whatever happened, and if not worshipped there would be ghaat on the family. That she would not be reasoned with and demanded bali, he says, showed it was some tamasik shakti. The previous owners, when contacted, flatly denied any ownership, rights or knowledge, and no solution was in sight.
When asked who she was and what she wanted, the speaker says, the shakti answered that she had been worshipped at this place for a very long time and that the place was hers. There had been a tree there — a mango, but a very small, thin one that never grew big — and her sthan was at its foot; the old family used to do her puja right there. These new people had cut that tree down. And secondly: "I want my puja. I take Bali. I need bali." The whole family was distressed, since they knew nothing of this and the previous owners who sold the plot had never said that anything of the kind was there or had to be done. The previous family was contacted again and asked to pacify the shakti or take her away, since the new owners had no idea of the vidhi-vidhan. When the knowledgeable visitor asked her, she said she would not leave the place whatever the situation: "This place has not been mine since today; it is very old. I will stay here and take my puja, and if not, there will be ghaat on the family." The speaker draws the inference: she was not willing to be reasoned with, and on top of that she was demanding bali — meaning this was some tamasik shakti. In that situation no solution was in sight. The previous owners flatly refused any responsibility, saying they had given up the land, held no ownership, had no rights and no knowledge — they simply backed out.
Disturbing a shakti's sthan makes you the doshi even unknowingly
Why force is not the right first answer against a shakti whose seat you have broken
When no way forward appeared, the speaker says, the knowledgeable friend took the matter to his guru. He reports the guru's first principle: using force here was not proper, because you have gone and settled on her sthan and you have broken it. However negative the thing may be, the trouble is that you did not remove her in the correct way. All of it happened unknowingly — and yet the doshi is you.
When no way forward appeared, the speaker says, the knowledgeable friend went to his own Guru and laid out the whole matter, asking what could be done. He conveys the guru's reasoning: applying force here was not proper, because you have come and settled on her sthan and you have broken that sthan. However negative the thing may be, the trouble is that you did not remove her in the correct way. All of this happened unknowingly, and yet the doshi is you.
Forcible removal versus shanti vidhan for a sthan shakti
A pacified shakti must be pacified again and again; a sattvik family cannot do tamasik puja
The speaker lays out the two routes as the guru gave them for a shakti whose sthan has been disturbed: either she is removed forcibly through the vidhi-vidhan of the tantras, or a shanti vidhan is done and she is pacified. But a pacified shakti is not quieted for good — she must be pacified again and again, so puja itself becomes the medium even for keeping her quiet. And since this family was completely sattvik, no tamasik puja of any kind could be done there; both obvious routes were closed.
What, then, could be done? The speaker lays out the two routes as the guru gave them. Either the thing is removed forcibly through the vidhi-vidhan of the tantras, or a shanti vidhan is performed and she is pacified. But with a shanti vidhan, he says, she would have to be pacified again and again — such shaktis are not quieted permanently — which means puja itself would become the medium even for keeping her quiet. And there the real obstacle lay: this family was completely sattvik, so no tamasik puja of any kind could be done there. Both obvious routes were closed, which is what led the guru to ask a different question next.
Who is Rahasu Bhagat of Thawe Dham?
Kamakhya entering him, the kangan, Raja Manan Singh's test, the destroyed realm and the hand-form installed there
The speaker says Thawe, near Saran district in Bihar, is a principal dham, and Rahasu Bhagat is its foremost figure, in a way a lok-devata. As the story goes, Bhagavati Kamakhya of Kamarupa entered his body directly and emerged from his head. She had given him a kangan through which he served people whenever famine struck; Raja Manan Singh, out of envy, did not believe it, imprisoned him and demanded he call her. Bhagavati warned that her coming would destroy the king and his realm; he insisted, she came to test her devotee, the palace and kingdom were destroyed, and the form that split Rahasu Bhagat's head and emerged as his hand wearing the kangan is what is installed at Thawe.
When the guru asked the family who their kuldevi was, the speaker says, the father answered that they were originally from Bihar, from near Saran district, where the dham called Thawe is. The speaker adds for his listeners that Thawe is a principal dham, and tells its lore. Rahasu Bhagat, he says, is the most prominent figure there — in a manner of speaking a lok-devata. His story is that Bhagavati Kamakhya, from Kamarupa, entered his body directly and came out through his head. There is a whole story of Raja Manan Singh, who did not believe in Rahasu Bhagat. Bhagavati Kamakhya had given Rahasu Bhagat a kangan (bangle), and it was through that kangan that he used to serve people whenever famine struck. Out of envy over this the king had him imprisoned and said he did not accept that the Devi had given it — if you have the capacity, call her and show me. Rahasu Bhagat did the AvahanThe invocation that calls a deity to be present in the image or yantra before worship begins.. Bhagavati said that if she came, the king and the entire realm would be destroyed; the king would not listen and insisted. So she tested her devotee and came, and the palace and the whole kingdom were destroyed. Bhagavati split Rahasu Bhagat's head, and what emerged was his hand wearing that kangan — and that very form, the speaker says, is what is installed at Thawe.
A shakti is never weighed by caste: Rahasu Bhagat and the Valmiki samaj
Both the plot's tamasik shakti and the lok-devata of Thawe belong to the Valmiki samaj
The speaker asks the listener to note two things: the shakti previously worshipped at that house was a tamasik shakti of the Valmiki samaj, and Rahasu Bhagat too is said to belong to the Valmiki samaj and is worshipped as a lok-devata. He says Sanatan culture has taken care of this everywhere — no shakti has ever been denied respect or held low on grounds of jaat-paat. It is simple, he says: one on whom the supreme grace of Jagadamba herself rests, how could anyone weigh them by caste?
Here the speaker pauses the story to have the listener take in two things. First, the shakti that had been worshipped in that house — the one whose sthan was there before — was a tamasik shakti belonging to the Valmiki samaj. Second, Rahasu Bhagat too is said to belong, in a way, to the Valmiki samaj, and he is worshipped as a lok-devata. From this he draws a doctrinal point: in Sanatan culture care has been taken over all such things everywhere. Never, on grounds of jaat-paat, has a shakti been denied great respect and honour, or been regarded as low according to its caste. It is a simple matter, he says — one on whom the supreme grace of Jagadamba"Mother of the World" — an epithet of the Devi. herself rests, how could anyone measure that person by caste?
Only the family's own kula shakti can control a sthan shakti without dosha
The guru's first question — who is your kuldevi — and his verdict; any other prayog carries dosha and one slip could go wrong
The speaker says that with both routes closed, the guru asked the afflicted family whom they worship and who their kuldevi or kuldevta is; they said they did nothing special, so he pressed until the father named Thawe Dham near Saran, Bihar. When they said she was worshipped as their kuldevi in the village but they had done nothing here, the guru ruled: only she, the kula shakti, can control this shakti. If we others attempt some prayog, he said, some dosha will attach; the thing could be done, but the slightest slip and anything could go wrong. The speaker adds that in tantra nothing is impossible — Bhagavati is such that anyone can be bound — but even so.
The speaker says that when the direct routes were closed, the Guru turned to the family on whom the trouble had fallen and asked: whom do you worship, who is your Kuldevi or kuldevta? They answered that they did nothing of the kind, no special puja-path. So he asked again: then tell me who the deities of your kula are, or who they could be. The father answered that they were originally from near Saran district in Bihar, where Thawe Dham is. The family told the guru that yes — she has been worshipped as our kuldevi; in the village we used to do her puja, but here we have done nothing. On hearing this the guru gave his verdict: now the control of this shakti can be done by her alone. Only the shakti of the kula can do it. If we, on the other hand, attempt some prayog, the guru said, some Dosha will attach somewhere along the way. The thing could certainly be made to happen — but if there were the slightest slip, anything could go wrong. The speaker adds his own gloss: in tantra there is nothing that cannot be done; Bhagavati is such that what-becomes-what, who cannot be bound — and yet, even so, the kula shakti was the right authority here.
Installing the kuldevi at home with the plot's shakti seated beneath her
Avahan at Thawe Dham, a swarup brought home, two small sthans, all by tantrokta vidhi with details withheld
The speaker says the whole family went with the guru to Thawe Dham and, by the method of kuldevi avahan, Bhagavati was invoked and invited: a swarup of hers was established there, worshipped at Thawe itself, and brought with the invitation to their home. Two small temples, two sthans, were made inside the house — one for the kuldevi, and the other, beneath Thawe-wali Maharani, for the shakti that had been worshipped on the plot. All of it was done by full tantrokta vidhi-vidhan by the guru, with many details, he says, that he is not sharing.
The speaker describes the remedy as it was done. The whole family, following the method by which a Kuldevi is invoked, went with the guru to Thawe Dham. There Bhagavati's AvahanThe invocation that calls a deity to be present in the image or yantra before worship begins. was performed — that is, she was given an invitation. A swarup of Bhagavati was established there, worshipped at Thawe Dham itself, and with that invitation she was brought to their own place. Then, inside the house itself, two small temples were built — two sthans within the home. In one, the family's kuldevi was given her seat. The other sthan was given to the shakti that had been worshipped on that plot — placed beneath Bhagavati, the Maharani of Thawe. All of these processes, the speaker says, were carried out by full TantroktaStated in the tantras, as against a vedokta form of the same rite or mantra. vidhi-vidhan; there are many things in it that he is not laying before the audience. The guru performed all those kriyas in the correct manner.
How a tamasik shakti's nature changes once seated beneath the kuldevi
Called back after the installation, she declares herself a sevika living on milk bhog
The speaker says that once everything was complete, the shakti was invoked again onto the woman's body, and she said of her own accord: "Here I will now live on the bhog of milk, because I am wholly under the control of the Mahashakti in whose presence I have been installed; as a sevika, close to the portion of Bhagavati seated here, I will remain present here daily." He asks the listener to consider that a shakti this fierce said this herself — that is how a shakti's prakriti changes.
The speaker frames what followed as a lesson in how a shakti's nature — its prakriti — changes. Once all the kriyas were done and complete, the shakti was invoked once more: she was called onto the woman's body. And this time she herself said it. Her words, as he reports them: "Here I will now stay on the BhogThe food offering placed before a deity before anyone in the household eats. of milk, because the Mahashakti in whose sanidhya (presence) my installation has taken place — I am entirely under her control. As a sevika, close to that portion of Bhagavati which is seated here, I will remain present here every day." Think of it, the speaker says: the shakti that had been so prachand, so ferocious, was the one saying this.
Case: an undisclosed shmashan-shakti sthan on sold land
Installed under the tree by an earlier Valmiki family member; nobody at fault, yet the buyers suffered for want of disclosure
The speaker says it later came out that a member of the Valmiki family who had lived there had, long before, gone to a shmashan, purified a shmashan shakti, installed her at home and given her puja, along with some acts of bhakti. Even his own family did not properly know this; they only kept up the daily dhoop-deep at the sthan under the tree outside the house. The land was later sold to two or three people, the sthan fell in this buyer's share, and nobody knew — so neither side was at fault, yet the family suffered because it was never disclosed. No great calamity occurred; by Bhagavati's grace they were saved in time.
The speaker then gives the back-story that surfaced only afterwards, once things were looked into fully. Some member of the Valmiki family that had earlier lived on that land had, long ago, gone to the shmashan, the cremation ground, and purified a shmashan shakti; he installed her at his home, gave her puja, and also did some works of bhakti through her. Even the people of his own family did not properly know this. They simply continued the daily dhoop-deep and whatever vidhi-vidhan there was, at the sthan under the tree — which was outside the house. Later the land was sold off to two or three people, and the portion this man bought was exactly the part where that sthan lay. No one had any knowledge of it, so the sellers were not wrong either. But because the information was never given, this family had to bear the suffering that followed. The speaker adds that no great calamity actually came to pass — by Bhagavati's grace they were saved in time.
A tamasik shakti pacified with raw milk and kheer under the kuldevi
A bhog-fed bhagat-tradition shakti turning shanta and saumya once Jagadamba's form sits above her
The speaker says that with that form of Jagadamba seated above, the family gained their kuldevi's grace, and the tamasik shakti already there — a bhagat-region shakti that runs on bhog and such offerings — also became shanta and saumya. A stream of milk was poured for her; she bathed in milk alone, was pacified by milk alone, and her bhog was raw milk with kheer and the like as her food. With that she was satisfied, turned gentle, and her very form changed.
The speaker sums up the outcome. Because that form of Jagadamba"Mother of the World" — an epithet of the Devi. came to sit above, the family received their kuldevi's grace — that much was certain. But because of that form, the shakti already there — a tamasik shakti of the bhagat region, the kind that runs on BhogThe food offering placed before a deity before anyone in the household eats. and such offerings — also became shanta and saumya. A stream of milk was poured for her; she bathed in milk alone, was pacified by milk alone, and the bhog offered to her was raw milk. Her food was offered within that — KheerRice cooked in milk, offered as naivedya in many vidhis. and the like — and with that she was satisfied, became gentle, and her very form changed.
Dream sign of a tamasik tattva departing: a dark woman with a mund and a cup of blood
Seen on the third day after the installation; the saumya ansh stays as the family's sawari
The speaker says the family told of a dream: on the third day after the installation, the woman on whom the shakti used to come saw a woman of fully dark, entirely black colour, hair open, a mund in one hand and a cup full of blood in the other, walking away toward the outside. That, he says, was the tattva or guna of the shakti as it had been, which departed by the grace of Thawe-wali Maharani, Jagadamba Kamakhya; her saumya swarup remained there as an ansh, who said she would keep coming daily as a sawari for this family.
The family told of one more thing, the speaker says. On the third day after the installation, the woman on whom the shakti used to come saw in a dream a woman of fully dark, entirely black colour, hair open, holding a mund (severed head) in one hand and a cup full of blood in the other, walking away toward the outside. That, the speaker says, was the form — call it the tattva or call it the guna — of the devi who had been seated there before, of that shakti; and it went away by the grace of Thawe-wali Maharani, by the grace of Jagadamba"Mother of the World" — an epithet of the Devi. Kamakhya. What remained there was her saumya swarup as an ansh (portion), who said she would keep coming daily as a sawari for this family.
Lesson of the case: regular seva of one's kuldevi removes life's troubles
A negative episode turned the family into sadhaks who now prosper; quick relief because the right people were found
The speaker says that today husband and wife are both sadhaks who practise well and, by Bhagavati's grace, lack nothing — wealth, grain, children and grandchildren. Though very negative, the episode turned everything around and led them onto the spiritual path. The suffering was greater than his brief telling shows; Bhagavati's grace was that things were solved quickly because the right people were found. His closing lesson is that listeners should do regular, correct, faithful seva-puja of their own kuldevi and kula shakti, and so remove the troubles that come into their lives.
The speaker closes with where the family stands now. In a manner of speaking they have entered the field of sadhana: husband and wife are both SadhakOne who undertakes a sadhana; the practitioner as distinct from the ordinary worshipper. and sadhika, and they practise quite well. By Bhagavati's grace they have received a great deal — they are full of wealth and grain, of sons and grandsons; there is no shortage of any kind and life is going very well. The episode was very negative for them, he says, yet it changed everything and carried them onto the spiritual path. That, he says, is the experience he wanted to lay before everyone: how the shakti of a place — where it was not her fault, and not the buyer's fault either — created circumstances in which the family was suffering. He has told it very briefly, but the suffering was considerable; Bhagavati's grace was simply that things were solved quickly, because the right people were found and matters came under control fast. His hope is that everyone will take a lesson from this true event, and by doing regular, correct, faith-filled seva and puja of their Kuldevi and Kula ShaktiThe collective protective and generative energy of a family lineage, invoked and honored alongside the Kuldevi and Kula Bhairava., will remove the troubles that come into their own lives.
These are notes of our learnings from a public external source (youtube video by author Grihastha Tantra). OccultGuide does not verify or originate the knowledge or the practices itself.